More than 40,000 people were killed in motor vehicle accidents in 2017, and distracted driving was a major cause. According to the National Safety Council, distracted drivers cause a death every 15 minutes. The repercussions of these tragedies are real for the workplace. A death of an employee can spur productivity loss, increase claims (whether workman’s comp or group health insurance), incur possible litigation for the employer, heighten stress and cause morale issues.

Safety shouldn’t end at the office – the most dangerous environment is out on the road. Participate in Distracted Driver Awareness Month. Create an employee awareness campaign and institute clear workplace policies regarding cell phone usage. If no policy exists, such use may be viewed as an acceptable practice. Remember: a distracted driver is four times more likely to crash.* Make it company policy that employees put down the phone while driving.

NSC offers infographics, posters, fact sheets and a number of social media-friendly initiatives: http://safety.nsc.org/ddam

They also have a webinar planned for this month. See the description below for registration information.

Webinar: Engaging Ways to Address Distracted Driving at Work

NSC Senior Program Manager Lisa Robinson and Medstar Risk and Safety Manager Shaun Curtis will present a free webinar, Engaging Ways to Address Distracted Driving at Work, on Thursday, April 19, 2018. With car crashes the No. 1 cause of workplace death – and distracted driving a leading cause of crashes – you can learn how workplaces can help addresses this problem in a way that engages employees. The webinar will be held at 11 a.m. Central time.  Register through this link: http://eventcallregistration.com/reg/index.jsp?cid=75732t11

Stacking uninsured motorist coverage, selecting coverage limits or rejecting coverage completely is a personal decision, but we recommend our clients consider stacked limits. Read the information below for more details on Uninsured Motorist insurance coverage.

What about uninsured motorist coverage? Should I elect or reject coverage?

If you or a resident relative are involved in an accident with an uninsured driver and you or the relative (and even passengers in your vehicle) are injured, who will pay for the medical expenses, lost wages, emotional distress or pain and suffering sustained due to the accident? The other driver may not have insurance or may have low bodily injury liability limits. Some protection will be available with Personal Injury Protection coverage on your automobile policy for you and your resident relative, but PIP coverage is typically $10,000.

What if the medical bills and expenses are close to $100,000 each? If you elect to carry Uninsured Motorist bodily injury coverage, there would be coverage available up to the selected limit.

Total rejection of uninsured motorist coverage can lead to a worst-case scenario that no one wants to experience: no coverage. You, your resident relative or a passenger in your vehicle then has to pay out of pocket for their expenses. Even if all injured parties have health insurance, there could be expenses not covered by health insurance. Examples include lost wages, emotional distress and pain and suffering.

Not long ago, Florida ranked 1^st for the highest percentage of uninsured motorists.  That’s a startling statistic – and yet another reason to reconsider adding or stacking uninsured motorist coverage to your policy.

Keep in mind that to elect the same limits of uninsured motorist coverage for all insurance policies, you should check for gaps in coverage. If your auto policy has 250/500 and your motorcycle policy has 100/300, you are not getting the same coverage from one policy to the next.

Stacked or Non-Stacked Uninsured Motorist coverage: What’s the difference?

Let’s picture uninsured motorist coverage as buckets filled with insurance protection. Each vehicle on a policy has a bucket of coverage. Each bucket contains uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage of 100/300 ($100,000 per person/$300,000 per accident) and there are three vehicles on the policy.

There would be three buckets, one for each vehicle, filled with 100/300 limits.

If the automobile policy has non-stacked uninsured motorist coverage, each vehicle has 100/300 coverage available for each vehicle individually. If the policy holder or a covered resident relative are injured by an uninsured driver, there is only the one bucket of coverage available for the vehicle involved in the accident.

Now, use this same example but change the coverage to stacked uninsured motorist. All buckets of coverage are stacked together to give three times the amount of coverage to the one car involved in the accident. Therefore, the available coverage would be 300/900.

Please keep in mind that the stacked limit will change if the number of vehicles on the automobile policy changes. Let’s say you delete a vehicle – then the maximum limit would change to 200/600 because there are two vehicles on the policy.

The bottom line is this: don’t depend on other drivers to ‘do the right thing’ and opt for coverage. It’s up to you to protect yourself and those you love in a sufficient manner.

A quote for this important coverage is simply a quick phone call to us.  Call today to speak with an experienced member of our team.

 

Postscript: This blog post was inspired by a client query regarding stacked versus non-stacked coverage. We hope you find our description as helpful as she did. Her response is below:

Thank you so much for this detailed email….Thanks for putting it into laymen’s terms so I can understand.  Your help is very much appreciated. 

-Carol Dettman-Smith

 

For more information detailing the benefits of stacked versus non-stacked insurance and to inquire about policy options, contact a W3 agent today at 727-522-7777.